Internet Blogger and Death Metal Band Collapse From Halifax, Canada.
St. Francis Xavier University
Death Metal Record Label Forward Regression Records and the author of Space Command
Follow Along With Me On Blogger!
Monday, February 25, 2019
United States: Foreign Countries Disrupt US Congressional Bill
United States Supreme Court
This month February 2019 President Donald Trump was sued from with the United States of America by several US State Attorney Generals for acting as President of the United States of America in a court lawsuit using a fake legal document which they attempted to pass through the Lower US 9th Circuit Court.
The basis of the lawsuit is an opposition to United States Congressional Bill HJ. Res 31 - The Consolidated Appropriations Act also known as the United States Border Wall funding Bill which has passed into United States Law.
The United States / Mexico Border Wall Funding Bill is a combination of a US Senate Agreement and Presidential Emergency Declaration Act which provides up to $8 Billion Dollars in Border Wall funding.
After the bill was signed a frivolous lawsuit was filed against the President for enacting a National Emergency to acquire additional border wall funding, I wanted to post all the text of the lawsuit and details of the Senate Bill but that it turns out is too long for this page, instead I will give you the page and paragraph numbers of the lawsuit against the President with the quotes so you can look it up.
Basically, what is happening is Donald Trump is being sued for acting as President of the United States.
This is a somewhat long post.
The point here is everyone knows that the Border Wall funding has been legally acquired already. I have to say first that the United States Constitution is not just for Democrats and Illegal Immigrants which is the challenge of the lawsuit. Donald Trump is acting Constitutionally for regular citizens, who have decided they want action taken at the United States Mexico Border, so just to remind everyone the United States Constitution still applies to regular citizens.
Here is where you can throw the whole challenge to the Border Wall Funding Bill out, if the Congress can't reach a decision and has a shut down, the President has the power to declare an emergency to acquire government funding.
That is the point of the President's office.
The United State's Senate can only "not agree" with the President for a short time because they are not in charge.
The office of the President has the power to veto the United States Congress decision to not act on the issue, and declare an emergency to gain funding. That is his decision only, and a part of the position.
What the lawsuit against the President is saying is that they are trying to "undermine" his Presidential Authority by blocking his decisions in the Senate and then filing lawsuits against him for acting within his powers at the Low 9th Circuit Court.
What this action does is removes the Power of The United States President's Office and places it on the Speaker of The House and Lower State Governors and State Attorneys.
The Democrats under the Speaker of the House and along with several State Governors and Attorneys are using this illegal maneuver to block Donald Trump from using the regular Presidential Powers.
What that means is they are trying to "strip" the President of his regular powers that have been given to him by the citizens of the United States who have voted for a Border Wall when they elected him.
After this, the President alone has the power to declare an emergency to get funding for the wall. That is his job only and why he was elected.
Again, the Democrats who lost the last US Presidential Election are trying to undermine US voters by not allowing the President they elected to use his regular Presidential Power to build the border wall by filing fake lawsuits at the lower US Courts in an attempt remove his regular Presidential Powers given to him by US Citizens.
In essence, they are arguing issues that are not challengeable in the United States. If what they were doing was true the President would have no power at all as the Countries leader and it would fall to the Speaker of the House and US State Attorney's which is what is being claimed in the lawsuit.
This lawsuit against the President is an attempt from the State Level to remove the President's powers and transfer them to the US State Attorney's and Speaker of the House through the lower US Courts.
Of course all this reeks of treason in the United States at the State Level and others in Washington D.C. in the Mueller probe have also been indicted in what looks like is pointing to charges of treason against them in Washington D.C. - the Death Penalty in the United States.
Who are the other collaborators?
Well according to the lawsuit filed against Donald Trump for acting as the President on behalf it is several State Governors potentially and US State Attorney's as well as the Department of Defense at the State level in several US States who are openly challenging the authority of the US President in the Court System, meaning they are trying to seize his power at the state level.
This is a short read of about 50 double spaced pages and mostly repetitive.
I will try to keep this simple so anyone can understand it and then at the end I will list my references and examples form the document in a list so you can look it up on the court file.
This is the summary and simple explanation:
The United States Citizens elected Donald Trump as President to Build the United States / Mexico Border Wall as well as other resolutions.
The Democrats and Several US States are trying to undermine the voters by illegally blocking border wall funding with several US State Attorney's - this will remove the Citizens from the last Presidential election and transfer the power to them through the Speaker of the House position.
Upon reading the document which is ridiculous and totally fake the border wall funding is not even the issue, and in the court case they even say the $8 Billion Dollars is not much money and the United States Military has a Defence Budget of over $40 Billion Dollars in California alone.
My first question was "What are they spending that money on?" which I will look into later.
For the United States diverting $8 Billion Dollars to build the Border Wall is not even any money at all considering the size of the Military's Defence budget in California alone which could pay for the entire wall.
Reading this supposed United States court document is a real test of my patience of the people running these phony political platforms in the United States and Canada, any judge agreeing with this document will probably be facing treason charges or an investigation coming out of the soon too be concluded Muller probe.
The real point to all this is that this is all an just attempt to undermine the President's Office and US Voters by over ruling Voters and the President at the State Level.
Also reading this document they reveal quite a bit of information about United States Military Bases Operations in several US States and information about the United States Defence Department in the Case.
So who are these people suing the President and trying to undermine US Voters?
Well it's coming from the United States Department of Defence at the State Level and US State Attorney's and they reveal quite a lot of information about themselves in the lawsuit.
If you have to pin point the reason for the opposition to the Border Wall it's not money, it's the United States Department of Defence along with several state Attorney's are pushing for an open border to allow illegal immigration, then these groups with illegal immigrants are backing the Democrats and putting them in office in Washington D.C.
The open border is allowing the Department of Defence and State Representatives to "import" citizens to back their political platform to get elected in Washington D.C. against what regular US Voters want who have backed Donald Trump and the Republican Party.
So the open border is their political platform, to back their party - all illegal.
This document falls into a couple small categories Military Spending, Defence Spending and Environmental Protection.
The actual opposition to the Border Wall is the US Department of Defense and sections of the United States Military at the state level.
That is their argument in the case, they want open borders so they can get illegal immigrants to back their Political Platform and undermine US Voters and the President of the United States by removing his power through the Lower US Court System and transferring it to the State Level under State Attorney's who are representing the US Department of Defence at the State Level against the President and US Voters.
All during the Muller investigation which is pointing to Treason in the United States of America - at the State Level.
Probably, a lower branch of the people implicated in the Muller investigation.
Here is what they are saying in this document and they use these "fuzzy" terms and you're not sure what they are representing.
They appear to be saying that several US States including Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, Nevada, New York and Oregon are "independent" states within the United States of America and are "sovereign nations" of some kind and are separate from the rest of the United States.
In Canada, the citizens are saying that Quebec and Atlantic Canada are separate Countries within Canada at the citizen level, but this is not recognized officially by Canada.
In the United States those 14 States are saying they are separate from the United States and that the United States Government is trying to "operate on their private land" and they are sovereign states separate from the United States.
That is not the citizens, they are saying the citizens are represented by the States Attorney General who has complete power of the citizens in an independent state.
Then these people saying that are trying to get this passed in the United States Court System that they are independent from Washington D.C. and operate at the State Level only, separate from the United States President - obviously, this is totally fake.
So they are making these bizarre statements about how the State's Attorney is in command of the Citizens in that location and the United States and the other 36 US States are trying to interfere in their independent operations.
Here is the next part.
So what about the money for the Border Wall?
These 14 States are saying that the money for the Border Wall is coming out of Military Budgets and Budgets for the Defense Department at the State Level, then they are saying that this is hurting their economy.
Then they are suing over economic damages to their states because the President is removing money from the Military and Defense Budget and that is their Economy.
In California they are saying that they have $40 Billion Dollar Defense Budget and their piece of expenditure from the $8 Billion Dollar Border wall is "damaging California's economy".
The money for the Border Wall the $8 Billion Dollars is only a one time deal to finish construction and then the money will be put back to it's regular budgets in the future after it is finished.
For example, if the Hoover Dam is breaking the Military will have to stop other dam maintenance to fix the larger dam during the emergency. Later other dam maintenance will be back to normal.
That is what is happening with the Border Wall.
It is not a permanent budget transfer. It is a mandatory fix.
Then they are making these ridiculous statements.
This lawsuit has already defaulted in the US Court System and they lost, President Trump should counter sue them for filing a fake court case because they will lose by saying their defence.
I guarantee that if the President Counter Sue's that these States will "default" in the court system and lose their case, by they are filing a fake lawsuit and it would be a fake defense in the court system, any judge agreeing with this case would be facing federal fraud charges and perjury in any regular courtroom, plus this case is all perjury anyway.
For example they are saying that the President of the United States doesn't have the authority to transfer Military Personal from Oregon to the Mexican Border to fix the Border Wall.
Then they are saying they are cutting their Military Budget in Oregon to build the Border Wall and that's damaging their economy in Oregon.
No that money is for the same soldiers to go from Oregon to Mexico to work on the Wall, they are only stopping construction projects in Oregon temporarily.
The soldiers will still be paid their wages, that is potentially the same people only the work is in Mexico for them not Oregon.
Then they are saying that the United States Government is attempting to build on Sovereign California land and they have no jurisdiction because California is not part of the United States, an outright lie and perjury in court in their lawsuit.
Here is the kicker:
They are saying the small $8 Billion Dollars diverted from the Military Budget is hurting the economy because it belongs to Private Citizens who are Defense Contractors for the United States Military and the Department of Defense.
That means, that the United States Military employed private contractors to hire citizens to work on Defense Contracts for the Defense Department and United States Military and now the Private Contractors and their staff want the wall construction stopped because the defense contractors want the Military Budget.
That's what they are suing over.
No one else has any money, and they won't issue $200 extra per month to welfare recipients....now the Military Defense Contractors who have a $40 Billion Dollar Budget from the United States Military in California alone to work on defense contracts are trying to stop an $8 Billion Dollar Border Wall because it's cutting into their contract money for them and their private staff and it's listed in the court case.
How about this for a resolution.."You're Fired."
All those defense contractors doing this need to be fired, plus it's illegal to undermine the President and US Citizens, now they want the citizens regular money too.
Not only that these 14 states claiming to be separate from the United States yet they are living off their Military Budgets at the Department of Defense are also suing because the wall is not part of a private defense contract for their businesses.
That's right, they are complaining that regular United States Soldiers who will build the wall for wages only is not constitutional because they want the defense contract for the wall for their private staff to make a profit off it.
The Border Wall built by the Military will be supplies and wages only for Military Staff...$8 Billion Dollars.
The Defense Contractors in these states are illegally suing through the Defense Department and State Attorney's to stop the wall because their Private Business is not getting any money.
Then they are also all running an illegal platform and using illegal immigrants to undermine United States Citizens and The United States President through backing the Democrat party with an open border policy.
In the court case they are also quoting "Environmental Protection" to stop the border wall.
When I read this what they are saying is that some areas along the United States Mexico Border are home to endangered species and probably National Parks.
What this tells me is that the Border Wall Construction needs to account for areas of environmental protection like National Park Areas.
Along with the Wall the United States Government will have to build "special sections" of the wall to account for wildlife parks and endangered species and wilderness regions.
What they need to do is when they do the Wall they need to establish "zones" for Environmental Protection and set them aside as "National Park Regions" and put in more Forest Ranger Stations and special fencing with enhanced security which will cost even more money.
The money to finish the Wall and build the National Park Regions and Ranger Stations will come from the $40 Billion Dollar California Private Contractor Budget because you're now all fired and the work will be done by Military Service only going forward.
In part two I will break down the specific quote and examples listed in this blog post.