Friday, June 22, 2018

Internet: Youtube Copyright Expungement

Youtube Copyright Expungement
Here is more information on the Youtube Copyright Expungement.

Of course, the Courts will have to declare this first and make a ruling BUT the public knows that they are expunged. 

Then the court has to make a ruling, none of this will happen until after Supreme Court rulings. Again, this is explained in the previous post but what happened is Companies misused their Copyrights against the public and the result is copyright expungement.

First, just let us pause for a moment to acknowledge the Copyright Expungement and how great this is for the public and what we can do with it. This is kind of like something that happened in the 1920's or something but it is taking place today. 

That's because if companies run a scam from the 1920's on the internet in 2018 the penalty is Copyright Expungement for Copyright Misuse and Abuse for those companies.

Anyway, they are the group that did it music, television and movies. They will be the example for the future of who got expunged on the internet when it first came out, then no one in the future will do that knowing what happened today in the early days of the internet.

Again, not all companies did this and Google will say that the group did it on their own and misused the Google Youtube policy against their permission, however the business copyrights are still expunged. The Courts will have to rule if  Google participated, in fact they may know already. Just keep that in mind that their has to be a court ruling.

So we need to stop for a minute here because knowing that their Copyrights are expunged this gives the Government a great chance to make a policy on the expungement.

Government people knowing this can take their time and "decide what they want to do" for what's going into the new laws for internet rules.

People working on these platforms need something like this Copyright Expungement as a platform to write new laws for the internet, knowing that they are expunged in advance gives them time to make the new rule books based on the fact that they know the ruling on the expungement will pass in the courts.

Knowing that they already won the copyright expungement gives them time to decide what they want to do with it when they write the new laws for Copyright on the internet.

Trust me, they need this expungement bad because it serves as a platform for them to be able to write the new internet laws and run for office etc. in the Government.

What the public gets is free files on the internet to do whatever they want with. Albums, movies, tv shows etc. all free to use and sell on the internet from the public domain.

It's like the whole file sharing community databases on the internet (almost) , all that stuff is public domain now because the companies misused their copyrights on Youtube and are going to be expunged, then they will be free usage public domain files.

However, it has to pass first. Knowing this will pass is great for the government as it gives them a chance to step in and write the new internet copyright laws for the future after the old files are expunged.


Who is affected by the Copyright Expungement, that would be any company that used the Youtube Content ID match and registered their files at youtube, then made fake users on youtube and didn't declare copyright ownership then removed other people files illegally that had similar content.

That's like Sony etc. and major companies. 

Not that they will close, they will just lose their copyrights and then anyone can use their files for anything they want.

After the ruling on the expungement, their new products will fall under new copyright rules for the internet and the new material will have copyrights that you can't use with regular copyright protection after they conform to copyright law.

That is why the Government will probably take their time knowing of the expungement to write the new internet copyright rules.

It would be like for those companies, anything after 2020 is Copyrighted but before that is public domain because of their expungement over copyright abuse on youtube.

Now, I have two topics here. 

1. The Youtube Content ID Software.

2. What you can do on the internet after the expungement.

The Youtube content ID is brand new in the last three years, when you load a file it scans the file and looks for content matches and returns who owns the content and then tells you if you are blocked or not.

People using the Content ID are facing Copyright Expungement for misuse of their copyrights.

The point is here that I know how the content id works or the theory of how it would work which I will explain. Then like Android which is free Linux anyone can make it. 

Well as you guessed it the Content ID is also made of free open source software that anyone can make.

When I first saw that Youtube was running this software my first glance opinion was that they don't have the means to make that at youtube or google to make that.

The Content ID Software is too big for Google to manufacture and is probably a larger operation than youtube itself, plus it's open source or public domain - anyone can make it.

The point is Google is not big enough to develop the Content ID Match software used on Youtube and  I doubt they have the means to make that. That's just because it's too large.

My first thought's were that well, a third party company must have made it for them.

Then they are probably their business partner.

I said to myself, fuck that looks like NASA made it. So my first thought was that it must have been a Private Contractor for the Military or NASA that built it for Youtube.

Like a private defense contractor, if you've never heard of that don't be surprised because the military or government will hire anyone if they can make that stuff and do it everyday.

My thoughts are that a private government or military contractor made it for youtube and google in a separate private contract.

So they also work for the military or government and then they also work with google / youtube as a business partner.

That's because the copyright content id match is too advanced for google to make so a large contractor must have made it that also works on government or military contracts.

That's everyday practice for them people, and that is who I still think made it.

Then I said well how does that work then?

Easy people, it's built on open source facial recognition software.

Youtube scans the file for matching facial features in your video that you upload to ones they have registered in their content id database and returns matches. If your video matches the one in their database it returns the name of the other video and says they own the content of the match.

It's so easy a toddler could make it for a Linux phone.

That's how you can tell it's silicon valley making this stuff,  it's just a bunch of kids making it like on google or facebook and its all open source.

Anyone with an actual education can shred their work in one second.

This is how it works.

They are making an "artificial fingerprint" on the registered video from a company and they assign it a Content ID.

Then they scan your file looking for the "fingerprint" and compare it to their database. If it matches they show you the owners name.

Its super simple and easy, but it's too large for them to make it. We're talking what trillions of fingerprints in their database? That had to be a contractor that made that.

To understand this, first think of video game software with the wire frames of people made of polygons and shapes.

The Content ID software would read the original video and "draw the wire frame work" like for a video game around the pictures in the video file.

Then they would make a polygon overlay on top of all the images in the file.

So they would draw polygons on top of the video stills for a video game.

That is basic facial recognition software people.

 Then they would do that for the entire video.

When they were finished each video is different and would generate a different polygon pattern.

So because all the images in original content are different, when you draw polygons on all the stills it generates a different result every time.

Something About Mary has a different polygon drawing outcome than Pulp Fiction.

Then when they scan your upload it draws that on your video and looks for the match in the database.

If it sees the drawing in the polygons on your video that they generated on Something About Mary or Pulp Fiction it matches with that video and says it's the content id generated by Something About Mary and then it returns the name to you "something about mary" then it says something like "owned by MGM studios" then is says "blocked" and your file is deleted.

ANYONE could make that people, it's just so large with the polygon drawings that Google can't make it for Youtube so it had to be a contractor.

We're talking trillions of Content IDs for that people, there's no way youtube made that for such a small page.

So that's how content id works.

You can do that at home like a toy for toddlers and it's free and probably open source software.

You just load the software and turn on your webcam and take your picture, then the software adds polygons to the picture of your face and makes a pattern.

Then when you turn if off  and turn it back on you sit in front of the webcam and press scan on the screen and it reads your face and matches it to the polygons in the database and when it sees the one that matches your face on the webcam it returns that picture and shows your your image on the screen.

Easy people, that's like basic University Project Work.

So the webcam reads your face and returns your picture when it matches the generated polygon pattern.

That's a joke people, that's like a Playschool toddlers toy for babies, it takes your picture and then plays it back to them.

That's too simple for stay at home moms and housewives and its more like a toy to entertain their toddler. That software is not even advanced enough to keep a housewife interested in it. Then it's just a novelty for their baby or something.

The Sound ID match is the same thing, instead the polygon match is on the picture of the wave file.

So youtube must rip the file to wave format and then polygon print and match it to their database to return the result of the sound owner.

They must rip the disc for Sony and them and the polygon print the picture of the wave file and id for Sony and those companies.

Then they compare your uploads print of the wave file to the matching polygon one they generated to find the user of the wave file image, then they return you the owner of the picture of the file, just like on the webcam for your toddler.

That's a joke people.

That is called a "digital fingerprint", it's just polygons drawn onto the peoples faces and on the picture of the wave file.

Then facial recognition software scans the files for matching polygon generated patterns, yawn. That's too boring people I'm too busy dating your mom to even bother with that and as you know she's not even very interesting.

So that is my explanation for how I would design their content id match and is probably exactly what they are doing.

2. After the expungement.

After this expungement takes place Youtube should be made into this....

Retaining the content, it should be an html webpage for file sharing open on the internet, then run by a public organization like the dns for video and audio file sharing on an open webpage.

Then all the expunged content should be made free for anyone to use.

Then if you post something on youtube it should be free for everyone to share within youtube like file sharing, but on an html webpage.

I mean come on people, shouldn't we have an html webpage for file sharing by now.

Then if a company posts a video anyone can share it within the page, they would still own the copyrights but any other user can use in only on Youtube.

The old content would be public domain.

So if I posted a video on youtube everyone on youtube could load it to their page, but they wouldn't own it. That is only for expunged content.

Then this would happen, everyone could use all the content on their for their own youtube channels that you can watch on smart tvs and smartphones.

When you search youtube the files would come up on a list like in a file sharing program but on an open html regular web page.

Then you could go onto youtube and make a tv channel off the content and expunged content and load it on to your youtube channel.

Then your personal youtube channel would look like mtv made of any online file sharing content.

Just within youtube.

Then, you can watch your channel on smart tv's and smartphones like real television. 

Then you can watch your channel that you made on the yourtube app on tv and smartphones.

The competition would be right, getting people to watch your show. Anyway good luck, but your friends could see it.

Just like homemade tv channels on Internet Television made up of file sharing content.

Then youtube would be owned by the FCC or something and regulated with the dns service as an html video and audio file sharing public network to load youtube onto televisions and smartphones made of user content.

So if the Government dosn't want to launch internet television, they should give that to the public so they can make it.

Doing that would create tons of free youtube television channels that you could watch on smart tv and would help launch internet television.

The public would launch internet television out of that content in one second if they gave it to us.

Right so why don't you fuck off and give us our stuff back so we can launch internet television out of the expunged content if the government and these companies won't do it.

Everyone at home would make that and launch it with six million channels in one second. Then they would be competing for tops spots in an unbiased environment, plus you could include your own content with the expunged content and make your own broadcasts for internet television.

That would help launch internet tv.

Finally, what convinces me that a contractor made that for youtube is that they gave them the 4G Phone network built by the military to run it. FUCK YOU.

Then the military built the 4G Phone network and some military or government contractor built the content ID and they gave them the wireless public owned internet network to run youtube and google for free.

So you can tell it's the government and military that did that because they made the 4G Network, that is owned by the public.

Then another government or military contractor must have made the content id match for youtube.

Then they all shook hands out back and gave google all the services made of free content because they hate the public.

Now all their Copyrights are expunged if they pass it or not.

Then the public wants the 4G Network back because they own it so they can use it at home to help launch internet television.

So instead of giving all that to the public which we paid them to do so we can make that stuff they gave it to some kid in silicon valley who can't program software for nothing because they hate us and like them better and all their work sucks.

Then they blocked all of us from using it when we can shred silicon valleys work at home in one second. 

That's because they are all just university kids who don't know anything getting a free handout from the government and then they blocked everyone at home who knows how to make the software.

Then they took all our files off the internet.

Then the Government gave all that to google and kids from silicon valley to run it on the 4G phone network made of free content.

Then everyone at home can shred them in one second and they wont give us anything.

Then they gave it to some prick kid in silicon valley for a free government contract on the 4G network and they kicked us off the youtube pages when we know how to make all that at home and the google people and silicon valley are just end users of open source content that people made at home.

Then they took everyone's home content that was open source and made youtube and google and the government gave them the 4g network to run it for nothing.

That's why everyone hates them.

Then those prick kids in silicon valley used the 4G network to run scams and advertising on youtube with it and it's all garbage.

Then they took all our files down.

So fuck you then.

Now everyone wants the 4g network back from the military and the file sharing content to use for free on youtube for internet television.

That's because everyone at home is already done making internet television but the government and military hates us at home and won't let us have it or file share on youtube because we want to load other peoples content so we can share files on the youtube television app.

Then we can watch each other's content on file sharing on television on the youtube app.

Then they took all that and gave it to some prick kid in silicon valley and gave them the 4g network and they just run ads on other peoples content all day because they suck and can't program.

Then the Government and Military thinks that is the real internet and let those kids run it because they are fucking pricks.

Then they hate us and won't look at us at home because they think we're dubbing tapes on the internet. So fuck ya then.

Now silicon valley is in breach of all the copyright laws and their copyrights are in expungement but it hasn't been ruled on by the courts yet.

Then the public wants the 4G Network back because we paid for it and want to use it at home to make new technology and inventions. 


Stay tuned because this is a huge topic.


No comments:

Post a Comment